OCD Permitting

nAPP2401953748 CLAWHAMMER 33-28-21 FED WEST PAD

General Incident Information

[fAPP2313836673] CLAWHAMMER 33-28-21 FED WEST PAD
[246289] WPX Energy Permian, LLC
Inactive
Liner Report Approved, Restoration Complete
Oil Release

F-33-26S-30E      341 FSL      1120 FEL
32.001555,-103.8882618 NAD83
Artesia
Federal
Eddy (15)

Severity Indicators










Notes

Industry Rep

Contact Details

Event Dates

01/18/2024

2/2/2024

08/07/2024  

Incident Dates

19.15.29 NMAC - RELEASES

Type Action Received Denied Approved
Remediation Closure Report [342020] 05/08/2024 05/09/2024
Liner Inspection Notice [337700] 04/25/2024 04/25/2024
Liner Inspection Notice [337698] 04/25/2024 04/25/2024
Liner Inspection Notice [307565] 01/25/2024 01/25/2024
Remediation Plan [342020] 05/08/2024 05/09/2024
Site Characterization [342020] 05/08/2024 05/09/2024
Cancellation Request [334272] 04/17/2024 04/25/2024
Initial C-141 Report [307569] 01/25/2024 01/25/2024
Notification [305745] 01/19/2024 01/19/2024

19.15.30 NMAC - REMEDIATION

Type Action Received Denied Approved

Compositional Analysis of Vented and/or Flared Natural Gas

No Compositional Analysis Found


Incident Materials

Cause Source Material Volume Units
Unk. Released Recovered Lost
Equipment Failure Pump Produced Water 20 20 0 BBL
Equipment Failure Pump Crude Oil 20 20 0 BBL
 
The concentration of dissolved chloride in the produced water >10,000 mg/l:           Yes           No        

Incident Events

Date Detail
05/09/2024 The (05/09/2024, C-141) application [342020] was accepted by OCD. The operator was emailed with details of this event.
05/09/2024 Liner report(s) approved.
05/09/2024 An application [342020] was submitted to OCD for review. It was submitted, indicating that it was an: [C-141] Application for administrative approval of a release notification and corrective action The operator was emailed confirmation of this event.
05/08/2024 The (05/09/2024, C-141) application [342020] was assigned to this incident.
04/26/2024 Cancellation request received on 4/17/24 due to improper location. After looking at the rejected liner report photos I pointed out the lat/long on them that put it at a different site and Jim Raley then clarified that the liner inspection was conducted at Clawhammer 33-28-21 Fed East Tank Battery but should have been at Clawhammer 33-28-21 Fed West Tank Battery. I will update the release location and WPX has agreed to conduct a liner inspection at both the Fed East and West locations now.
04/25/2024 The (04/25/2024, C-141C) application [334272] was rejected by OCD. The operator was emailed with details of this event.
04/25/2024 The (04/25/2024, C-141L) application [337700] was assigned to this incident.
04/25/2024 The (04/25/2024, C-141L) application [337698] was assigned to this incident.
04/25/2024 An application [334272] was submitted to OCD for review. It was submitted, indicating that it was an: [C-141C] Request to Cancel the Notification of a Release The operator was emailed confirmation of this event.
04/17/2024 The (04/25/2024, C-141C) application [334272] was assigned to this incident.
04/09/2024 The Remediation Closure Report is denied. If an OCD Environmental Specialist is unable to make it to location, a liner inspection should be conducted by company representative/environmental consultant. A liner Inspection should include facility/well name, date, and incident number. All dried mud, trash, salt remnants, and sage brush should be removed so that the surface of the liner can be inspected. A short checklist should include: responsible party inspected liner, gravel was removed, liner was power washed, liner was able to contain the leak in question (no rips, tears, or holes), and remained intact. Also, photographs of clean intact liner illustrating liner integrity should be included, as well as a picture of the well location sign (name, location, emergency contact, etc..). Include the two business days’ notice given to the OCD to conduct liner inspection on site. Form C-141 pages 1,2, and 6 should be signed/dated and included in the updated liner inspection report.
04/09/2024 The (04/09/2024, C-141) application [310312] was rejected by OCD. The operator was emailed with details of this event.
04/09/2024 An application [310312] was submitted to OCD for review. It was submitted, indicating that it was an: [C-141] Application for administrative approval of a release notification and corrective action The operator was emailed confirmation of this event.
02/01/2024 The (04/09/2024, C-141) application [310312] was assigned to this incident.
01/25/2024 The (01/25/2024, C-141) application [307569] was accepted by OCD. The operator was emailed with details of this event.
01/25/2024 C-141 received on 1/25/2024 for release on 1/18/2024. The cause of the release was reported as “Equipment failure (pump).”
01/25/2024 An application [307569] was submitted to OCD for review. It was submitted, indicating that it was an: [C-141] Application for administrative approval of a release notification and corrective action The operator was emailed confirmation of this event.
01/25/2024 The (01/25/2024, C-141) application [307569] was assigned to this incident.
01/25/2024 The (01/25/2024, C-141L) application [307565] was assigned to this incident.
01/19/2024 The (01/19/2024, NOR) application [305745] was assigned to this incident.
01/19/2024 New incident created by the operator, upon the submission of notification of release.
01/18/2024 Release discovered by the operator.

Incident Severity
Major release as defined by 19.15.29.7(A) NMAC?
Yes No 		From paragraph A. Major release determine using:
        (1) an unauthorized release of a volume, excluding gases, of 25 barrels or more.

Incident Corrective Actions

Initial Response

The source of the release has been stopped.
The impacted area has been secured to protect human health and the environment.
Released materials have been contained via the use of berms or dikes, absorbent pads, or other containment devices.
All free liquids and recoverable materials have been removed and managed appropriately.
If all the actions described above have not been undertaken, explain why:

         


Site Characterization

What is the shallowest depth to groundwater beneath the area affected by the release? Between 100 and 500 (ft.)   bgs
What method was used to determine the depth to ground water? NM OSE iWaters Database Search
Did this release impact groundwater or surface water? Yes No
Are the lateral extents of the release within 300 feet of a continuously flowing watercourse or any other significant watercourse? Between ½ and 1 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within 200 feet of any lakebed, sinkhole, or playa lake (measured from the ordinary high-water mark)? Between ½ and 1 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within 300 feet of an occupied permanent residence, school, hospital, institution, or church? Greater than 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within 500 horizontal feet of a spring or a private domestic fresh water well used by less than five households for domestic or stock watering purposes? Greater than 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within 1000 feet of any other fresh water well or spring? Greater than 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within incorporated municipal boundaries or within a defined municipal fresh water well field? Greater than 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within 300 feet of a wetland? Greater than 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release overlying a subsurface mine? Greater than 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release overlying an (non-karst) unstable area? Greater than 5 (mi.)  
Categorize the risk of this well / site being in a karst geology? Medium  
Are the lateral extents of the release within a 100-year floodplain? Greater than 5 (mi.)  
Did the release impact areas not on an exploration, development, production, or storage site? Yes No

Remediation Plan

Have the lateral and vertical extents of contamination been fully delineated? Yes No
Was this release entirely contained within a lined containment area? Yes No
On what estimated date will the remediation commence?  
On what date will (or did) the final sampling occur?  
On what date will (or was) the remediation complete(d)  
What is the estimated surface area (in square feet) that will be remediated? 36012   (sq ft)
What is the estimated volume (in cubic yards) that will be remediated? 0   (cu yds)
Is (or was) there affected material present needing to be removed
Is (or was) there a power wash of the lined containment area (to be) performed

OTHER (Non-listed remedial process)?


Release is indicated as entirely contained within a lined containment area. Deferral Requests are not expected; any received may not be granted for this incident.

Remediation Closure Report

Have the lateral and vertical extents of contamination been fully delineated? Yes No
Was this release entirely contained within a lined containment area? Yes No
What was the total surface area (in square feet) remediated? 36012   (sq ft)
What was the total volume (cubic yards) remediated? 0   (cu yd)
OTHER (Non-listed remedial process)?

        Liner was washed and successfully inspected.


Release is indicated as entirely contained within a lined containment area. No Reclamation Report is expected or required for this incident at this time.

Release is indicated as entirely contained within a lined containment area. No Re-vegetation Report is expected or required for this incident at this time.

Orders No Orders Found


Click to go back to top of page