OCD Permitting

nAPP2506641719 LEMANS 2419 ST COM 304H

General Incident Information
[30-015-49939] LE MANS 2419 STATE COM #304H

[372165] Permian Resources Operating, LLC
Active
Reclamation Report Approved, Pending submission of Re-vegetation Report from the operator
Oil Release

E-24-20S-26E      0 FNL      0 FEL
32.55525,-104.345217 NAD83
Artesia
State
Eddy (15)


Severity Indicators














Notes

Industry Rep


Contact Details


Event Dates

02/21/2025

3/10/2025

11/05/2025  

Incident Dates

19.15.29 NMAC - RELEASES

Type Action Received Denied Approved
Reclamation Report [492791] 08/06/2025 08/07/2025
Remediation Closure Report [492791] 08/06/2025 08/07/2025
Sampling Notice [444833] 03/24/2025 03/24/2025
Remediation Plan [492791] 08/06/2025 08/07/2025
Site Characterization [492791] 08/06/2025 08/07/2025
Initial C-141 Report [440368] 03/07/2025 03/07/2025
Notification [440349] 03/07/2025 03/07/2025

19.15.30 NMAC - REMEDIATION

Type Action Received Denied Approved

Compositional Analysis of Vented and/or Flared Natural Gas

No Compositional Analysis Found


Incident Materials

Cause Source Material Volume Units
Unk. Released Recovered Lost
Equipment Failure Dump Valve Crude Oil 4 0 4 BBL
 
The concentration of dissolved chloride in the produced water >10,000 mg/l:           Yes           No        

Incident Events

Date Detail
08/07/2025 The (08/07/2025, C-141) application [492791] was accepted by OCD. The operator was emailed with details of this event.
08/07/2025 Reclamation approved.
08/07/2025 An application [492791] was submitted to OCD for review. It was submitted, indicating that it was an: [C-141] Application for administrative approval of a release notification and corrective action The operator was emailed confirmation of this event.
08/06/2025 The (08/07/2025, C-141) application [492791] was assigned to this incident.
06/05/2025 The (06/05/2025, C-141) application [464124] was rejected by OCD. The operator was emailed with details of this event.
06/05/2025 Reclamation reports need to include the following: Executive Summary of the reclamation activities; Scaled Site Map including sampling locations; Analytical results including, but not limited to, results showing that any remaining impacts meet the reclamation standards and results to prove the backfill is non-waste containing; At least one (1) representative 5-point composite sample will need to be collected from the backfill material that will be used for the reclamation of the top four feet of the excavation. The OCD reserves the right to request additional sampling if needed; pictures of the backfilled areas showing that the area is back, as nearly as practical, to the original condition or the final land use and maintain those areas to control dust and minimize erosion to the extent practical; pictures of the top layer, which is either the background thickness of topsoil or one foot of suitable material to establish vegetation at the site, whichever is greater; and a revegetation plan. A five-point composite sample needs to be collected from the topsoil used to backfill the pasture and the backfill used on pad. These should be tested for all Table I constituents. Submit updated report to the OCD by 8/4/25.
06/05/2025 An application [464124] was submitted to OCD for review. It was submitted, indicating that it was an: [C-141] Application for administrative approval of a release notification and corrective action The operator was emailed confirmation of this event.
05/16/2025 The (06/05/2025, C-141) application [464124] was assigned to this incident.
05/07/2025 The (05/07/2025, C-141) application [450258] was rejected by OCD. The operator was emailed with details of this event.
05/07/2025 Remediation closure denied for the following: 1) In the remediation summary you write: “Forty (40) subsamples were collected from the base of the excavation then combined to form eight (8) 5-point composite samples.” Explain this process. 2) On the Chain of Custody all confirmation samples are grab samples. Per 19.15.29.12(D) NMAC the remediated areas must be tested for contamination with representative five-point composite samples from the walls and base. Explain. 3) A C-141N was submitted on 3/24/25 to collect samples on 3/26/25. The chain of custody for all confirmation samples says they were collected on 3/27/25 however the date was changed by the laboratory to 3/26/25. Notes from the laboratory say: “04/04/25 - Client changed the sample date on all samples (see COC).” Explain. 4) On pg. 3 you write “Permian will reclaim the pasture area by preparing and reseeding, following the completion of all remediation activities.” Was the pasture area addressed? 5) As this release occurred both on and off pad, the remediation photographs provided should include captions describing what areas are being viewed, including the direction, dates taken and sample points shown. 6) Under the Site Characterization portion of the C-141 application, update the minimum distances to the following upon resubmittal: any other significant watercourse (1000 ft -1/2 mile to the W). Refer to topographic map on pg. 8. Submit updated remediation closure report to the OCD by 8/5/25.
05/07/2025 An application [450258] was submitted to OCD for review. It was submitted, indicating that it was an: [C-141] Application for administrative approval of a release notification and corrective action The operator was emailed confirmation of this event.
04/09/2025 The (05/07/2025, C-141) application [450258] was assigned to this incident.
03/24/2025 The (03/24/2025, C-141N) application [444833] was assigned to this incident.
03/07/2025 The (03/07/2025, C-141) application [440368] was accepted by OCD. The operator was emailed with details of this event.
03/07/2025 An application [440368] was submitted to OCD for review. It was submitted, indicating that it was an: [C-141] Application for administrative approval of a release notification and corrective action The operator was emailed confirmation of this event.
03/07/2025 The (03/07/2025, C-141) application [440368] was assigned to this incident.
03/07/2025 The (03/07/2025, NOR) application [440349] was assigned to this incident.
03/07/2025 New incident created by the operator, upon the submission of notification of release.
02/21/2025 Release discovered by the operator.

Incident Severity
Major release as defined by 19.15.29.7(A) NMAC?
Yes No
From paragraph A. Major release determine using:
        (2) an unauthorized release of a volume that:
                (a) results in a fire or is the result of a fire.

Incident Corrective Actions

Initial Response

The source of the release has been stopped.
The impacted area has been secured to protect human health and the environment.
Released materials have been contained via the use of berms or dikes, absorbent pads, or other containment devices.
All free liquids and recoverable materials have been removed and managed appropriately.
If all the actions described above have not been undertaken, explain why:

         


Site Characterization

What is the shallowest depth to groundwater beneath the area affected by the release? Between 100 and 500 (ft.)   bgs
What method was used to determine the depth to ground water? NM OSE iWaters Database Search
Did this release impact groundwater or surface water? Yes No
Are the lateral extents of the release within 300 feet of a continuously flowing watercourse or any other significant watercourse? Between 1000 (ft.) and ½ (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within 200 feet of any lakebed, sinkhole, or playa lake (measured from the ordinary high-water mark)? Between 1 and 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within 300 feet of an occupied permanent residence, school, hospital, institution, or church? Between 1 and 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within 500 horizontal feet of a spring or a private domestic fresh water well used by less than five households for domestic or stock watering purposes? Between 1 and 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within 1000 feet of any other fresh water well or spring? Between 1 and 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within incorporated municipal boundaries or within a defined municipal fresh water well field? Greater than 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release within 300 feet of a wetland? Between ½ and 1 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release overlying a subsurface mine? Greater than 5 (mi.)  
Are the lateral extents of the release overlying an (non-karst) unstable area? Between 1 and 5 (mi.)  
Categorize the risk of this well / site being in a karst geology? High  
Are the lateral extents of the release within a 100-year floodplain? Between ½ and 1 (mi.)  
Did the release impact areas not on an exploration, development, production, or storage site? Yes No

Remediation Plan

Have the lateral and vertical extents of contamination been fully delineated? Yes No
Was this release entirely contained within a lined containment area? Yes No
  Chloride *** (EPA 300.0 or SM4500 Cl B) 32   (mg/kg)
  TPH (GRO+DRO+MRO) (EPA SW-846 Method 8015M) 0   (mg/kg)
  GRO+DRO (EPA SW-846 Method 8015M) 0   (mg/kg)
  BTEX (EPA SW-846 Method 8021B or 8260B) 0   (mg/kg)
  Benzene (EPA SW-846 Method 8021B or 8260B) 0   (mg/kg)
On what estimated date will the remediation commence? 03/21/2025  
On what date will (or did) the final sampling occur? 03/26/2025  
On what date will (or was) the remediation complete(d) 04/07/2025  
What is the estimated surface area (in square feet) that will be reclaimed? 1500   (sq ft)
What is the estimated volume (in cubic yards) that will be reclaimed? 20   (cu yds)
What is the estimated surface area (in square feet) that will be remediated? 1500   (sq ft)
What is the estimated volume (in cubic yards) that will be remediated? 20   (cu yds)

This remediation will (or is expected to) utilize the following processes to remediate / reduce contaminants:

 
(Ex Situ) Excavation and off-site disposal (i.e. dig and haul, hydrovac, etc.)
Which OCD approved facility will be used for off-site disposal? [fEEM0112342028] LEA LAND LANDFILL


OTHER (Non-listed remedial process)?


No active remediation deferral request was found for this incident.

Remediation Closure Report

Have the lateral and vertical extents of contamination been fully delineated? Yes No
Was this release entirely contained within a lined containment area? Yes No
All areas reasonably needed for production or subsequent drilling operations have been stabilized, returned to the sites existing grade, and have a soil cover that prevents ponding of water, minimizing dust and erosion? Yes No
What was the total surface area (in square feet) remediated? 1500   (sq ft)
What was the total volume (cubic yards) remediated? 20   (cu yd)
All areas not reasonably needed for production or subsequent drilling operations have been reclaimed to contain a minimum of four feet of non-waste contain earthen material with concentrations less than 600 mg/kg chlorides, 100 mg/kg TPH, 50 mg/kg BTEX, and 10 mg/kg Benzene? Yes No
What was the total surface area (in square feet) reclaimed? 1500   (sq ft)
What was the total volume (in cubic yards) reclaimed? 20   (cu yd)
OTHER (Non-listed remedial process)?

        Remediation activities have been completed at site.


Reclamation Report

Have the lateral and vertical extents of contamination been fully delineated? Yes No
Was this release entirely contained within a lined containment area? Yes No
What was the total surface area (in square feet) reclaimed? 1500   (sq ft)
What was the total volume (in cubic yards) reclaimed? 20   (cu yd)
Is the soil top layer complete and is it suitable material to establish vegetation? Yes No
On what estimated date was the reseeding to have commenced? 04/09/2025  
OTHER (Non-listed remedial process)?

        Reclamation activities have been completed at the site.


No re-vegetation report data was found for this incident.

Orders No Orders Found


Click to go back to top of page